|
Post by shiyabul on Aug 19, 2024 8:50:37 GMT
Regardless of whether a company is still hoping for hybrid or going all-in on WFH we’re seeing clear trends — and several successful strategies to consider in “In the Building” Blocks The lack of interest in returning to an in-person workspace is so widespread that some job postings that mention on-site requirements don’t get any applicants at all. The investment in office space is a real, fixed cost for many companies. But we are counseling clients to use the building for https://lastdatabase.com/ functions that truly require the in-person setting and enable the customer service function to WFH. The on-site labor shortage for customer service is so critical that a recruiter recently said she’d much rather work on filling a $/hour third-shift remote role than a $/hour on-site one. The message here is clear and practical: workers will take less money to get the location/flexibility they want. For the same role, we can typically secure a remote hire at $/hour but will need to go to $/hour-plus for in-person. THE LACK OF INTEREST IN RETURNING TO AN IN-PERSON WORKSPACE IS SO WIDESPREAD THAT SOME JOB POSTINGS THAT MENTION ON-SITE REQUIREMENTS DON’T GET ANY APPLICANTS AT ALL. Some companies are diverting their office space rent into better training and employee assets to make WFH easier, and it’s working very well.
|
|